| Austin the dog's profileButtercup's HangoutPhotosBlogLists | Help |
|
7/24/2007 What is there left to say that everyone hasn’t said to me already? Or Poor Alessandro Petacchi…As many of you know, especially those of you who know me, I love July. July is the time of the best sporting event in the world – the Tour de France. Ever since I was 16, I've been following the Tour, mostly because we didn't get coverage on this side of the pond until Team 7-Eleven and Greg LeMond headed to Paris (even though Canada's Steve Bauer rode in the race before that, but I digress…) Fans who follow cycling (like me) have been getting a lot of heat from people who watch SportsCentre or read the Sports section of the paper but don't follow the sport, mainly because of the inordinate amount of coverage devoted to the use of illegal performance enhancing methods used by some athletes in the sport. (Not like there aren't other athletes in other sports who use these same methods, but I'll get to that later…) For the past three months, I have been doing nothing but defend the sport of professional cycling to everyone I know. There are a lot of problems in the sport, and though it might be known for an inordinate amount of "banned substance" use, that's really only because professional cyclists are tested for substances more often and frequently than any other athlete participating in any other professional sport. True, they test athletes in soccer, in MMA, in Track and Field, but you don't hear much about that since, in those sports, the athletes aren't made to hand in a diary of their daily schedules on a monthly basis so that lab technicians can show up at any time, any place, interrupting your private life to say, "We're here for some blood and pee. Sorry, no picnic for you today."
[I take that back, and I apologize. Rasmussen had us all fooled – whether or not he doped is no longer the question. The answer is, he lied to everyone, and asked his wife and child to lie for him, so that he could “train” in Italy. He fooled the Tour organizers, he fooled the media, but, and most hurtful, he fooled the fans, like me, who just needed something to believe in…]
And things were looking up, so much so that an Italian cyclist, Alessandro Petacchi, the World Cycling champion and Olympic Gold Medalist, was forced to pull out of the Tour de France, because he had taken one extra puff of his asthma medicine during one stage of the Giro d'Italia (Tour D'Italie). That was kind of like penalizing a diabetic for taking a little too much insulin to compensate for the extra glucose he might intake during the ride… The good news is that Petacchi was cleared of any misuse of drugs or any wrongdoing today. As he said himself, "this is the greatest victory of my life". But of course this news will be overshadowed by the fallout from Team Astana, or, as we had been affectionately calling them, Team Borat. We were cheering them along as they suffered crash after crash, especially the big one that nearly took out who we believed to be their Fearless Leader, Alexandre Vinokourov, the pride of Kazakhstan (the real Kazakhstan; he is not the son of Bilo the Rapist) who had no fingertips, no skin on his leg, and had to get 60 stitches in his knees. But still, he persevered…he struggled to finish each stage, and his stand-in, Andreas Kloden, was forced to remain as second banana in spite of nearly blowing the field apart in both time trials, while the team remained behind their Leader. Vino, whom we all thought could face the formidable…well it turns out he might not have been able to face his own fears of losing the Tour de France. Now I could be very much "well we don't know the results of the second test…" but listen, as my Italian friends tend to say. This Tour de France is being scrutinized more closely than any previous Tour has ever been. Each of the riders signed an agreement with the UCI (Union Cycliste Internationale) that basically violates their basic human rights just so they could ride the race. When they affixed their signatures, it was a legally-binding agreement, meaning that if it were violated, the UCI could take away anything and everything that cycling gave to them. (OK so my cycling fanatic friends are going to say that I'm being melodramatic, but reread the agreement and you tell me…) So who would be stupid enough to dope, do steroids, or, in this case, bloodpack? All I can say is, if Vinokourov was that desperate that he thought he wasn't going to be caught transfusing his blood, then he has more psychological problems than he does doping problems. Perhaps it was the pressure of being the Golden Boy of Cycling; perhaps it was the pressure he had put on himself before the race to make sure that everything was in order and in place for his victory ride up the Champs Elysees; perhaps it was only the fear of being the fifth most popular man in Kazakhstan after Bilo the Rapist, Borat, and his son Hooeyloois; perhaps it was seeing that dream die in a matter of seconds as he crashed on the road… Am I saying that he had a homologous blood transfusion? I will say this… I don't think that he would have felt the need to try to enhance his performance in any manner had he not crashed in the opening days of the Tour, amplifying the pressure he placed upon himself to win, win, win…that was evident by his facial expression in Stage 15, when he nearly cried after winning the stage by more than 3 minutes over his next competitor. The man I feel sorry for in all of this is his second banana of Team Astana - Andreas Kloden. Kloden has been forced to be a domestique (secondary rider) for any team he's been on. He was a domestique for years for Jan Ullrich, who himself has been accused of juicing and other enhancements, in a team surrounded by controversy (T Mobile) after the "investigations" into the doping scandals started 24 months ago. Kloden then went on to a team where he thought he might be able to shine, only to be made a domestique for Vinokourov, only given a chance to shine in his time trial skills. Kloden had been riding the Tour of his life, and had crashed almost as badly as Vinokourov. Twice. In Stage 14 when it was obvious that Vino could no longer make it through the Tour, Astana finally surrendered the flag to the stand-in, and Kloden, who had been forced to hold back himself, struggled to maintain his place in the Top 5. Kloden was making a comeback in Stage 15, and had become the new "leader" of Team Borat…and now his dream of being on the podium in Paris has been shattered just as badly as Vino's fragile ego. Kloden is 32 years old and his time is probably done. He's been a domestique for two people accused of using illegal methods to win Tour stages, and will probably end up mired in scandal himself, when more than likely he doesn't deserve it. How the mighty have fallen…just as the sport is rebuilding itself, it gets another crushing blow. Whether or not Vinokourov packed his blood or not is irrelevant – just the mere hint that it was possibly done and the sight of a positive test has brought the sport crashing to its knees. Will I stop watching the Tour? Not at all. There are a lot of clean riders who have worked really hard over the past 15 stages to establish themselves at the tops of their games, and they deserve our attention and praise. David Millar, a reformed juicer who is back in his first Tour after being banned for two years, is showing just how much gumption it takes to ride this race completely clean, even avoiding cortisones for his arms which are blistering under the hot Mediterranean sun. Alberto Contador, in second place and first in the under-25 category, has a titanium plate in his skull as a result of a horrific crash he suffered a couple of years ago, and is riding the mountain stages with ease and without fear.
[I apologize for this as well. Apparently there are still cowards in the pack, most notably from the team who has been wrapped up in doping scandals for the past decade, Cofidis, whose star rider sitting in 54th place, Cristian Moreni, tested positive for synthetic testosterone. Not only was he using, but he was allegedly dealing, as the French police waited for him at the end of Stage 16 and took him from the finish line to the paddy wagon. IMHO, Cofidis should have never been allowed to participate in the Tour after the doping scandals involving their team, and after they became the butt of all EPO jokes. This latest arrest and disgrace only serves to confirm that Cofidis will do anything to try to regain their former glory. Good riddance…] – these stories should not be denied or destroyed just because of one man's selfish vision, no matter how idolized this man was by the rest of the peloton and the world. 7/5/2007 Roid RageI'm sure you've all been waiting with bated breath to find out what I think about this whole Chris Benoit thing. After all, most of you know that I've been a huge fan of wrestling, er, "sports entertainment" since I was about 14. I have my own theory on what happened in the Benoit house, but I'm not going to beat a dead horse, pardon the pun. Benoit was a great wrestler, no doubt, and a great human being for most of his life, and so what happened in the last 72 hours of his life should not define his legacy. That's all I'm going to say about that (I'll send you a private message of my private blog if you're really curious). So why the title of my blog? Well, I'd like to point out something that perhaps the Benoit tragedy has brought to light. The world is becoming a more violent place. (I hear the collective "duh" of all 3 of my readership) But have you ever stopped to wonder why? Is it video games? More violence on TV? Parents mollycoddling their children to the point where they can literally get away with murder? Steroid abuse? First off, let me preface this again by saying I am not a doctor, nor a medical professional of any kind. I just observe the human condition and know my own constitution pretty damn well. I also read a lot and watch a lot of Discovery and PBS in HD now that we have an HDTV (and those nature shows look so fucking cool!!! Sorry, I digress…) But I will tell you that the more people talk about how the body reacts to steroids, the more it made me think about exactly what is happening with the world today. Steroids can be prescribed by your physician to be used sparingly in order to treat an injury of some kind. A good physician will warn you or, even better, will limit the amount of steroids that you're allowed to take during the time of your prescription allotment. Usually, it's never more than 2 weeks at a time. That way your body doesn't become dependent on them and that way your body can use the "boost" from steroids along with its own ability to heal (yes, did you know that the human body can heal itself? We often forget about these things during this time of modern medicine. Now you can't grow another leg, but your body will knit skin and blood cells over a cut to seal your internals from the external world. It's called a scab.). If you take steroids for too long, bad things happen. You become an addict. Plain and simple. And addicts, who can't get their fixes, are just nasty people all around. Just ask anyone who's tried to quit smoking or to give up coffee. Steroids break down the internal mechanisms of the body content and basically "weaken the fibers" – they stretch them out so that you have a more bulky body, which, in the case of bodybuilders, gives you more muscle mass to build up and strengthen, but doesn't necessarily become the cause of your greater strength. Now, you may or may not know, but steroids are sometimes injected into farmers' crops in order to give them a boost – they will grow faster, stronger, and be more plentiful, and thus, cheaper to use since there's more produce available. A farmer will make more money by selling a greater quantity of his food versus a better quality of food. And that food goes right onto our tables, and into our mouths and our children's mouths. We're getting doses of steroids that aren't even prescribed, in our meats, in our tomatoes, in our dairy products… And who eats the most food out of any group of human beings? Teenagers. Why? Because their bodies are developing at an exponential rate – the human body only develops faster in infancy throughout one's lifetime. They eat tons of food – tons of genetically-modified, steroid-filled food. And they're constantly hungry. That's why all of these snack manufacturers use teenagers in their ads. You're flaked out on the couch, and you're hungry – here, have a pizza pocket. Except that pizza pocket is made with pepperoni from a steroid-filled cow or pig, steroid-enhanced wheat stock ground down to make flour, tomatoes injected with fish guts to make them less susceptible to bugs, and about 100 lbs. of salt, another massively-addictive substance. As many people have said, many wars have been fought over salt, so I don't need to say any more. So you have a continually-hungry, ever-growing group of people who just can't get enough of anything. (Remember when you were a teenager and the world was so unfair because you weren't allowed to have or do what you exactly wanted?) These people, and all of us overall (except for the organic, holier-than-thou people who don't believe that they're being exposed to any of this – well, unless they're living on another planet, they're still breathing the same air as we are, and are thus exposed to the same toxins and substances that we are. Don't kid yourselves, hippies.) are being unknowingly pumped full of steroids, and we just keep wanting more. If one of the side effects of steroids is triggering enragement in people, then imagine how many ticking time bombs of people there are right now. Those same kids participating in drive-by shootings. The same people who get behind the wheel of a car and start ramming into the person in front of them because they didn't get into first gear within .0734 seconds of the light turning green. The young kids bullying others on school grounds. It almost makes you happy that some kids are getting their aggression out on Grand Theft Auto 10 instead of acting it out on the streets. So what can we do? Go hippie? Partially. You can become more informed about what you put into your piehole and what your kids put into theirs. Ask questions. Read labels. If you think organic produce is too expensive to purchase, go to a farmer's market or, if you live outside of a city, go to the farm itself and ask each of the vendors what they put into their crops, how they grow things, and then, when you feel satisfied, shop there. Here's one of the tenets of capitalism – if we stop buying a product, manufacturers will stop making it. Nobody bought new Coke – they stopped selling it. (OK so 15 years later they took out the sugar and are calling it Coke Zero, but hey, they took out the sugar.) If we stop buying meats and other products full of steroids, farmers will have to stop using them. Nobody likes to lose money. And we don't need to lose any more of our generation to violence that they have no idea how to control. 5/31/2007 Empowerment?In our quest to be equal, have we lost sight of what it truly means to be a woman? This week, it was announced that a new birth control pill was approved for use in the USA that will virtually eliminate a woman's monthly period. Many women celebrated and started calling up their doctors right away, to say "help me live my life", and get put on the pill immediately. When I heard about this, two things immediately came to mind: 1. my friend A. who has the worst periods imaginable, suffers from anemia, and was unaided by any type of previous birth control pill available, should be jumping for joy. Hopefully this Pill will eliminate her female troubles without the need for the last resort alternative – the hysterectomy. 2. All the party girls in the world, and those women who are "inconvenienced" by their periods will start taking this stuff like wildfire, many of them in their child-bearing years, thinking that it's too early for them to worry about having kids. Then one day, they'll meet someone and want to possibly bear a child, only to run into a myriad of fertility problems after years of deceiving their bodies into believing that they were pregnant for over 10 years or however long they choose to take this new "miracle pill". I remember when I first got my period. I was 11. That was 26 years ago, for those of you who are counting, and probably longer than many of you who are reading this have been alive. Now, I was very lucky. I've been bang on regular since I started. I've never had periods so painful to the point that I needed to go on Anaprox or other muscle relaxants; I never lost so much blood that I would become anemic and had to take extra iron pills (I do have an inherited blood condition, but it was never altered too badly by my monthly visitor). But when I went on the Pill the first time at the age of 24, it completely messed me up. I was sicker, I gained more weight, I had cramps, and I had an uncontrollable temper. Then my doctor put me on a lower dose pill, and voila – I was fine. It was back to normal. And I was certain every month that I was not pregnant, when my monthly visitor showed up. In fact, the only time that my monthly visitor has never shown up has been when I was pregnant. My point is this – as young women, we are told that having a period is the key thing that makes us different from boys. We have the power to reproduce. Having a period gives us the right to be moody, to feel our emotions rather than bottle them up inside, to each chocolate and bitch about life and truly have one secret thing that makes men run for the hills, screaming in fear. Entire cultures have rituals dedicated to women during the time of their periods, rituals that could be seen to be misogynistic but in reality were either meant to or have evolved into bonding rituals for women coming together in a common cause. We were told to be proud of our periods – periods are the symbol of the power of womanhood. The whole point of feminism and equality between the sexes was for men to accept us as we are – human beings who had reproductive rights on our side, and who showed that we were much stronger than they were, since we could bleed for five days and not die, and as such, women are able to do anything that men can do (and sometimes even better). Periods are empowerment, not hindrances; we told men that periods are not a barrier to keep us from being whatever we wanted to be. But once you get rid of your period, or rather, eliminate it through these artificial means, then you have truly equalized yourself – you've become a man. You're no different than a man – you don't get your period, you don't have a monthly right to bitch, and, while you're on that pill, you don't have the ability to get pregnant and continue life. Instead of telling men to accept you as you are, blood and all, you've decided to eliminate the one "disadvantage" that you were born with in order to be equal. Doctors are saying this thing is safe. In the short term, I'd guess that this is perfectly safe. Has anyone checked the long-term consequences of not having your period and then deciding that you want to have children? Check out most of the fertility clinics in Canada and the US if you want to see the results of long-term abuse and misuse of hormone pills. Like anything, this pill should probably be used in moderation – maybe for a couple of years or, if you're never planning on having children at all, indefinitely. If you're not worried about screwing up your insides or if they're already so screwed up that nothing else is going to matter, then go for it. It could possibly save you risky surgery. One other thing…does everyone remember when doctors used to smoke? In the delivery room? This is akin to a female doctor prescribing this new pill and saying, "It's safe. I take it myself." If she's been taking this pill for over 10 years and then successfully was able to have a child without the use of fertility aids, then it might be safe to trust what she's saying. But then again, if your doctor tells you to go ahead and take this Pill indefinitely as a way to make your life more "convenient", then she might as well hand you a pack of Marlboros and a lighter. Only most women I know who smoke were still able to get pregnant when they were trying to... I will probably be accused of sabotaging the female agenda and living in the dark ages and putting women's rights back 1000 years or whatever…My whole philosophy has always been people should do what they want, provided that they know exactly what they're doing. Feel free to start on this pill if you want, but just make sure you have all the facts and have assessed the reasons why you feel the need to eliminate your period. If they're medical, like my friend A., then I really hope this works for you. If they're merely to make things more convenient and less messy for you, then you might want to think about the reasons why you feel that way about yourself rather than taking a magic pill hoping everything will all go away when you just might be making things worse for yourself. 4/13/2007 The Bus DriverWhy are childless women so hateful of women with strollers? When I say "childless", I don't mean young women who haven't had a chance to have kids yet (though sometimes we see you run the other way when we're coming with our buggies, making sure your headphones are securely in place inside your ears), or even women who, through no fault of their own, cannot medically have children and don't have the financial means to adopt locally, never mind go to Africa and do a Madonna or a Jolie-Pitt. I mean those women who have reached menopause or are on HRT to try to keep it at bay or who just let themselves go (or all three) who have never had a long-term fulfilling relationship, never mind a child, and give any mother with a stroller walking by herself (i.e. without an adult male companion) the evilest of evil eyes. If you're a mom who's ever walked down the street with your stroller, you know exactly what I'm talking about. That look as if your leprosy was so profound your nose is falling into your cleavage. The shaking of the head. The rude muttering (because most post-menopausal women who have never had a fulfilling relationship tend to start muttering to themselves when they walk down the street. It's an early sign of multiple cat syndrome senility). They let doors fly in your kid's face, they don't move out of the way in WalMart when you're walking down the aisle with a stroller basket full of diapers, wipes, formula and sleepers…it's the most bitter of bitternesses, more bitter than even Angostura could have ever made. A few weeks ago, I encountered such a woman driving on my bus route while I was on my way home from shopping. I should have known she was one of those women the minute that she stopped the bus and wouldn't lower the kneeling bus so that I could easily wheel the stroller on. Most drivers, male or female, do that without hesitation. I even had one driver apologize to me because the kneeling capacity was broken. But I digress…we're not here to talk about nice bus drivers. They don't make for good stories. So this bitter pill in her shoe polish black hair and oversized sunglasses just stares as I struggle to get the stroller on, show my pass, and then lock the stroller into place in one of the wheelchair spots. I always try to use a wheelchair spot unless of course someone with a wheelchair needs it, so that other perfectly-capable-of-walking passengers can easily walk, run, or fall down the aisle (depending of course on the driver) without the hassle of trying to maneuvre themselves around a big stroller with a little baby inside. Anyway, she goes speeding down the road, coming to rolling stops at each minor stop, barely allowing enough time for passengers to step on and off…whatever, she wants to go on her break. They all drive like that, but especially the ones who smoke, whenever it's nearing break time. Somehow my child is sleeping through all of this, but it's fine, because it's only a 20 – 30 minute bus ride to get us home from the point where I got on. A few stops later, another woman with a stroller and an older woman with a walker get on the bus. They stand in front of me. I ask the woman with the stroller if she is getting out before my stop. She tells me yes. I say fine, because I would have volunteered to switch places with her if she wasn't, as it is impossible for two strollers to pass along the aisle of the new buses. The way we were positioned, people could walk to the seats at the back, but it was going to take some tricky driving for me to be able to get out of the bus unless she left first. So of course you know what happened – my stop came up before hers. It turns out that she thought I meant the west end of the street, and I meant the east end. No big deal. I pull the bell, and start to manipulate my stroller down the aisle. I manage to switch places with the woman with the stroller just as the bus pulls up to my stop. However, now I have the problem of the old woman with the walker to deal with. The walker was right in front of the door (as it should be since people with walkers and canes should sit closer to the front), and my stroller could not pass around it. Some nice passengers had volunteered to help us move the walker up and out of the way, and I was just starting to move towards the door when the driver shut the front doors and drove off. The passengers and I started to shout. "Excuse me, I wanted to get out there." "Hey lady, she's trying to get out." The bus driver pulls up to the next stop. The walker is halfway in the air, and my stroller is underneath. I try to leave the bus again, and the people waiting to get on the bus outside stand aside. I am nearly at the door when she shuts the door and drives off. Everyone in the bus is outraged. I am very glad that at that point they are doing the shouting for me because I really don't want to wake my baby. "Why couldn't you wait?" they say. "I was almost off the bus," I say to her. "Look, it's not my job to sit there and wait for you people to figure out how you're going to get off the bus," she shouts back. "I don't have time to sit there. I have a schedule to keep." The men are shouting at her the loudest. I was so outraged I don't even remember everything they said. But I remember what she said. And I'll never forget that screechy, estrogen-smoke-riddled voice. "If the old lady would have just gotten off and made room then I wouldn't have to wait. It's not my job to help these people out. Jesus Christ!" She stopped the bus at the next stop (so now we are 3 stops away from my original stop). At this point, I moved my stroller towards the back of the bus because the woman with the walker wanted to get out of the bus at this stop. Instead of getting out of the front, because I really did not want to deck this driver, I wheeled my stroller towards the back doors and shouted, "I am so very very sorry I inconvenienced your day today, ma'am." A gentleman helped me take my stroller out of the back doors, but he asked me very loudly, "Why are you sorry? She is the one to be sorry, not you." I said, "She knows what I mean, sir. Thank you very much, though, sir, for being so kind. It's good to know that there are still some decent people left in the world." As soon as I got out of the bus, I pulled out my cell phone and noted the number on the side of the bus. I confirmed with the gentleman that we were reading the same number, and immediately dialed the customer service complaint line for the TTC. I got a very decent and nice woman on the phone. I apologized for not getting the driver's name or number, but I did tell her what bus number and route this woman was driving on, and said verbatim what she had said to me. "Excuse me, ma'am, she said WHAT?" the customer service rep asked. "Look," I said, "I know everyone has a bad day now and again, but I'm a mother with a young child, and there was another mother with a young child, and we don't have cars obviously so we depend on the TTC to get around. Most drivers are pretty good to women with strollers. I have never been treated so rudely by another human being in my life, never mind a TTC driver." She apologized, and told me something would definitely be done about that. So fast forward now to this past week. I am going to work, so I'm without my usual companion in the stroller, on the bus that passes by my house to take me to work (I live near about six different bus routes). I get on a stop a little further away from where I live since that stop is closer to where my caregiver lives. Who gets on the bus, in her TTC jacket, at the stop right in front of my place? At first I wasn't sure if it was her…until I heard her cracking jokes with the bus driver and flirting in that sickening, post-menopausal classless way that those women who are so fucking desperate to hang onto their youth do. And then I realize…I've seen her entering and exiting my building before. This woman is, in essence, my neighbour. Somehow, that makes it worse. But at least I can confirm she lives alone. And is quite bitter on a daily basis. I'd really like to raid her medicine cabinet to see if it really is full of nicoderm and estrogen. She looks right at me without a hint of recognition. I give her the most evil of evil eyes, though I doubt if she saw it through those gawdy, oversized sunglasses she was wearing on that overcast day. According to a friend of mine, when the TTC receives a complaint about a driver, a serious complaint, the driver's driving privileges are suspended though they are still paid. The TTC has a 3 strike rule. I really hope that one day I run into this woman in the lobby or hallway of my apartment building while I'm wheeling my stroller. I think I'll ask her if she's sorted out exactly what it is she is supposed to do at her job. She might slam a door in my face, and if she does…I have no qualms about enacting strike number three. 2/24/2007 Blog Censorship - WTF?Good morning???... what time of day is it, Keedz? I've been awake for nearly 48 hours straight. Babycup is teething and is in that stage just after stomach flu when you get all constipated and gassy and the acidophilous hasn't kicked in yet...even a stint in mommy's big bed did nothing to cure the insomnia from pain. And the kid still hurts, too...
While in this surreal dream waking state, I harken back to an email I got from a friend of mine, whom I hope doesn't mind if I parapharase it here (we can sign the rights permission agreement at a later date if that's okay with you, bud). He was really upset because he kept getting flack about his blog. Now I'm not talking about the kind of flack that some of you Keedz give to me because I swear or use bizarre methods to bring up Babycup, like using love, hugs, and kisses when he cries instead of being the Ice Queen and staring at the child to "toughen him up" (the baby is NINE fucking MONTHS OLD. Who wants a tough 9 month old?? You just shouldn't have a kid if that's what you want - get a pet fucking rock instead!). This was my buddy's private blog, which he writes for himself (as all of us bloggers do in the end - the Internet has provided such an expansive and inviting form for egomania cultivation, and you know we feel that everyone wants to hear what we have to say, because we are so great and superior above all other creatures...oops **shoves ego back into Pandora's box** sorry about that...she got out again!) and shared with only a few close friends because he wanted to share his thoughts with us. He's no stranger to debate; in fact, he had a political blog which was created just for that forum - to debate his political thoughts with us (and, in spite of being a right-wing war-mongering, poor-taxing, arts-programs-cutting, health-care-privatizing, suit-wearing fascist, he's actually pretty fair and level-headed about listening to the other side of an argument before he tells you that he and Prime Minister Robot Boy are always right...lol).
Anyway, back to the email I received from him a few days ago (which could be up to 2 weeks ago since lack of sleep tends to make one lose track of time - just ask Travis). He told his private selection of friends that he would no longer be giving any of us access to his blog because some one of us had become offended at something that he had said in there. He just didn't want to deal with that kind of flack against his private thoughts, so, although he is still writing the blog (at least I hope so) he is no longer sharing his writing with anyone.
That makes me very sad.
Now it's his business if he wants to share or not share his blog. What makes me sad is that he decided to share his innermost thoughts (not easy for a Right-Wing Conservative to do in the first place) with a select few of his friends, people whom he trusts (and he's not someone who trusts very easily because of his life experiences), and one of these people decided to attack him because they were offended by what he wrote. Now, this person had the right to be offended, but, if you know your close friends as most people know their close friends, you know that sometimes friends will say something that will offend or hurt you, but it's not meant to be directed at you as an attack. They are being honest, and one thing that we should all appreciate in our good friends is their abililty to be honest with us, and honesty means taking the good with the bad.
But that leads me to something else...you're reading someone's blog. You get offended. Is that any reason to cause them to shut down the blog? That's censorship, period. Yes, in this case, my friend felt the need to censor himself (which I am truly upset about), but where does this lead to in the online world of blogging? Someone writes something on a blog that might be considered to be racist (see my last entry), sexist, violent, or offensive in some other way (the background colours they use are harsh on the eyes, etc.) and a reader who gets offended decides that they want to have the blog shut down. What purpose does that serve? Hiding the truth doesn't protect anybody. Kids are going to find out that there are evil people in the world - our job is to show them right from wrong. If all of the "wrong" is hidden, it doesn't protect them; it just makes them less prepared to deal with it when they come across it, or, worse, makes it more attractive when they become teenagers because it's something 'taboo'.
Now I'm obviously not talking about someone who performs criminal activity on their blog, like having nude pics of babies being fucked or clips of blockbuster movies available for viewing (both are criminal you fucks; read the Copyright Law). Those fuckers should be shut down and prosecuted to the full extent of the law. (Lucky for you, there are only fines available as punishment for uploading and displaying copyrighted materials on personal blogs, that is, if they get around to imposing the fines. Usually they just ask really nicely for you to take it down. But some poor extra fuck who might get about six cents of residuals for his appearance just lost another six cents thanks to you. Famous actors are rich; not-so famous actors and Canadian actors still have to make ends meet by working part-time at Starbucks, hoping to serve some famous director his Caramel Macchiato).
I'm talking about those people who were responsible for ratings systems on TV, ratings systems on records, people who just say in general "you can't say that because I don't like it and nobody else should like it, either". If they are imposing control on people's private blogs, imagine what will happen when they gain power over public ones! Now my friend closed his blog so he wouldn't have to deal with this crap anymore. That's how these people get power - they just become so annoying that, instead of dealing with them and telling them that they're being unreasonable, people just give in and say "all right" and do what they ask so they'll go away. That's how censorship started, and hopefully, that's how it will end - someone will stand up to these fucks and say "you know what? You're entitled to your opinion, and equally, I'm entitled to mine. Let's agree to disagree, and let's leave this piece up to allow other people to have the same opportunity to form their own opinions."
Just as an end note, I realise I don't know the whole story when it comes to the reason why my friend closed off his blog. I just want him and all of you to know that neither he nor anyone else committed to writing a blog, whether public or private, should ever have to be put into that position. People who write blogs are sharing their thoughts and feelings; people who read blogs have the right to disagree, and even be offended, but neither have the right to personally attack someone just because they agree or disagree with something that has been said, nor do either of them have the right to suppress their right to say it.
2/20/2007 When You Take Your Backyard for GrantedYoung people today should appreciate what they have. I know I sound like an old curmudgeon. But I’ve noticed in this city of the Tdot that the younger generation would rather stick close to the fast food joints near where they live, and maybe venture to a “fancy” restaurant downtown that some snooty reviewer said was “divine” just to be seen and not for the food, than explore the vast multiethnic culinary delights that we have to offer. I shouldn’t be so general. It’s only the young people who were born and raised in the Tdot who are so fussy and selective. And it doesn’t matter what their cultural background is – they prefer the sickly sweet salty selections of the 2 minute meal instead of venturing across town and going into a place that might actually be interesting and teach them something, not only about another culture, but about themselves. If it weren’t for the white bread kids who moved to Toronto from the vast tundra wasteland regions of the four corners of Canada, these little restaurants would barely survive. Yeah, okay, that’s a bit of an exaggeration, or maybe not – Toronto’s restaurant community has a faster turnover than that of New York, which is only slightly slower than the rate at which most pancakes will be turned on a griddle today. But my point is that the kids who come to Toronto to go to school, to come to work, to live that Hollywood North dream, all explore those corners of the city that the rest of us twist our noses at and say “ewww”. In my humble observations over the past little while, well, okay, really, it just hit me suddenly one day as I was taking the bus from work and it was filled with all different kinds of rugrats from various backgrounds and various grades. Maybe I’m getting old, maybe it’s because my rugrat is starting to babble, but they all sounded the same, had the same vocal inflections, had the same lack of manners, and were all drinking Timmy Ho’s. I hope it was hot chocolate – caffeine does indeed stunt your growth. But that’s another story and rant for another time. These kids take their backgrounds for granted. “Curry? That crap? My grandma makes it all the time.” (I had typed in ‘mom’ there, but knowing how many parents of second and third generation Canadians work full-time, they’re not cooking or trying out anything too new these days, either.) See, the keedz who move here from Moose Factory come looking for curry, and they find it in droves – red curry, green curry, yellow curry – a veritable traffic light of flavours. And they’re not too twisted-nose to try any of them. For most of the keedz who come here as students, they go even one step further – they will go to the various ethnic markets and buy things to try to cook them. “You bought an octopus?” ‘Hellayeah – it was only 65 cents!’ Now I’m not saying that everyone born in Toronto lacks adventure, nor that everyone who comes here from Thunder Bay is adventurous – if they were, Timmy Ho’s would never have become the franchising monster magnate that it is today – I have just observed this in the young keedz that I see strolling through the shopping malls who think Mr. Greek is an exotic food experience. I’m talking to you lot – food is not about a two minute experience. Food is necessary to survive, but what you choose to eat can help you make it through the best and worst times of your life. If you’re in such a hurry, go get a Vietnamese sub instead of a conglomerate one. You want a wrap? Have a roti instead – it will fill you up for the rest of the day. And yes, they will make it mild for you. Feel like having fish? Go Portuguese – nobody does seafood like the Portuguese. Just ask Nelly Furtado. But most of all, don’t be afraid to walk into these places and point at something on the menu and try that. Even if you don’t speak their language. You might be surprised at yourself. Who knows? You might even become a chef and try to infuse all of the new flavours you discovered into one stellar signature dish that makes you world-reknown. 1/13/2007 Happy New Year's ResolutionHappy New Year, Keedz! Well it ain't but eleven days into 2007 and I've already semi-broke one of my resolutions. Considering how many people try to quit smoking or lose weight or quit weight to lose smoking and give up after 72 hours, I guess I'm doing pretty good. But I'm still not writing as much as I would like. At least I recognize this and I'll nip it in the bud somehow...somehow...
So Buttercup is back at the bureau. Fun, wow. Life is so exciting. Actually, it's tragic. I have to leave Babycup every morning, but even worse, I have to walk him in the polar ice winds that surround our new building (yes, we moved and yes, we moved into a wind tunnel) to get to his caregiver's place. So he gets pissed off at me, and takes it out on the poor caregiver until she feeds him. Somehow, eating is never a problem for Babycup, and I'm thankful for that. The poor child is teething now, and they're all coming in at once. And, with Babycup being the Gemini that he is, he's happy and laughing one moment and screaming in pain and inconsolable the next. But my caregiver can handle that, and, even better, she can handle me. I don't like leaving my little man, but if I had to leave him anywhere, this would be the place.
As for work, the more things change, the more they stay the same. They may have moved me from my desk, given me the crappy phone, and generally isolated me from my protective environment of being surrounded by two-high filing cabinets (hey, as all you keedz know, a fort is a fort, no matter what it's made of), hired some new people, let some people go, but it's all the same rigmarole. I came back to find that there were some issues that I thought I'd left behind seven months ago that were still piled up on my desk. It was literally as if I had never left...
In other news, something absolutely horrific happened to a friend of mine. I can't say much because of the legal ramefications of the mere mention of any of the details, however, what happened to my friend was a violation akin to a home invasion at gunpoint or a rape in a dark alley. Without being too explicit and without being too subtle, since I believe that the person who violated my friend still reads this blog (to clarify, this person was a friend of my friend's and as such came to know me as well, and would have seen the tagline for my blog in any emails I might have sent over to them), not that this person got the idea of the violation from any ideas stemming from this blog, and if they did then they are reading more symbolism into my words than could be found in a Joyce novel; however, the Violator (which I shall call this person until I get the legal OK to tell you all the details of this person's life so you can send your ex-con friend named Bubba over to their house to teach them a lesson or 10) has made it perfectly clear to my friend that they are no fan of mine (no big whoop, lots of people dislike me, lots of people like me, to each their own) and have made serious slanderous and libellous threats against me via electronic communication (how's that for broad subtlety?). So, if you're reading this, Violator, I'm not going to be as stupid as you are and put anything that may sound like a threat in writing for the whole world to see, nor am I going to brag about the amount of hard evidence that both the Violatee (for lack of a better word) and I possess that would demonstrate to the world just exactly what threats you have made against people, and, most importantly, hard evidence that we possess (and others possess it too, in case the Violatee and I are simulaneously hit by two separate buses at the same time on the same day) that you naively believed might have been erased from the various hard drives in your life that you've utilized both within and outside the confines of your abode. I am just going to say to you, Violator, that you should really stop casting stones, and get over yourself. I will say for everyone to hear that if you even think about coming near Babycup, before you can even take one step towards the stroller, one of Toronto's finest will be hauling you downtown by the ear. And before you jump to conclusions (because it appears to be one of the only things that you do and do well, Violator), that's not a threat. It's a warning. In the Province of Ontario, it is a criminal offence to threaten to inhibit or prevent the laying of criminal charges against someone by trying to persuade the person to set aside any evidence they may have that ethically must be presented to the Crown, just as it is an offense to retain evidence of any criminal activity that has or may have taken place. Sorry if those words are too big for you to follow; might I suggest you discuss this with your lawyer.
As for my friend the Violatee, I'm really sorry this happened to you. I hope that you are able to resolve this issue so that you can once again find peace of mind, body, and soul.
12/29/2006 Back in the 21st Century..."Merry New Year!"
And it is certainly a merry holiday! I am sitting in front of my brand spanking new Intel Core 2 duo laptop with the ginormous 17" monitor. And it's as sweet as pah.
Babycup is doing well. He is teething and his front top 2 are coming in, so things are a bit hellacious for me, but I'm sure the Tylenol people appreciate my business these days.
Thanks to those of you who expressed concern regarding my last blog entry. I would just like to say that, in the end, the brink was caused by hormonal fluctuations, and now that those have stabilized, I'm feeling much more like myself these days. Of course, the purchase of a 50" TV and a 17" monitor laptop doesn't hurt, either! Big screens help calm hormones down - it's a scientific fact. Well for me anyways...
I cannot believe that this year is nearly over, and that in less than 9 days, I go back to the grist mill grind of the office. That I will leave my precious Babycup in daycare. Of course, I might have won the lottery tonight (it's $32million CDN), in which case, I'll give a big old FUCK YOU to my job (not to the people just to the job) and take Babycup and the Boy on a worldwide trip to visit the various lands of dead dictators. Oh sorry, did I mention that I have CNN on in front of me? Those clever clever Americans - executing Saddam in the holy time of the Islamic calendar just before the biggest holiday that ends the Muslim holiday season. Those clever clever Americans...
But back to this going back to work thing. I think the thing I will miss most of all is the 20 hours of TV that I was watching a day. Now that I have a 50" TV, I have to leave it every day to go to work for 9 hours. Life is so unfair...
As is the tradition, I have a bunch of New Year's Resolutions. One is to ensure that I do something for myself, and just for myself, every day, so that I can be a better parent to Babycup and a better partner to the Boy. Another is to make sure that I write something every day so that my writing doesn't go completely down the shitter (as it seems to have started to do - geez, I'm so out of practice, but that's what happens when you're working with a piece of technology that has a 20 second delay per keystroke). And the last is to make sure that, no matter what happens, my Babycup is happy. He is generally a happy baby as you can see, but this year might be a little stressful and traumatic for him, so it's all about making sure that when he falls, he lands on a bunch of pillows (this is a metaphor, people. I will not be chasing the baby around with a bunch of pillows when he starts to walk...).
Of course, some things will remain the same. I shall be more than happy to point out the stupidity of others, whether it pertains directly or indirectly to me. So look out people - do something fucked up, and your portrait could appear right here on this blog.
Finally, to all of my current and former cohorts in crime that are going through major medical issues right now - no, I haven't told anyone else about what's going on with you, not even people who know you or knew you. Just know that, even in the midst of motherhood madness, I am here for you, I am thinking and meditating about you, and sending you positive healing vibes (some people call this praying, some people refer to it in this hippie-dippy way. I actually send out airborne health waves, so I hope you catch the goodness!). You guys and gals are some of the best people in my life, and what's happening to you now is pretty fucking shitty. Take care of yourselves, and don't eat the hospital food!!!
Wishing you all a prosperous and happy new year without any fuck-ups!
12/2/2006 It Would Never Happen To MeI wonder if Angelina or Gwen or Britney go through post-partum depression? Or if they even had the baby blues? Of course, they can afford high-priced shrinks to help deal with their issues. They don’t have to try to deny it like the rest of us new moms do. Now every mom gets the baby blues at some point. You know, those feelings of how am I going to look after this helpless creature? Or What do you want, little person? Stop crying, please! At which time mom and baby both end up crying because neither know what to do. Usually that goes away after the first few weeks. Call it hormones stabilizing, call it bonding with the baby. But sometimes, the blues just don’t go away. Or, as in my case, they don’t show up until later. According to the experts, post-partum depression can occur anytime from the moment of birth up to a year after the birth of the baby. Funny thing is, that’s the same period during which SIDS can occur. Coincidence? Probably, but the incessant worry that something has happened to your baby during the one time when you can’t protect them can loom over a new mom like Pennsylvania fog. I thought I had managed to surpass all of that. When my baby was born, he was (and still is) the pure joy of my life. Even though I spent the next 72 hours awake, trying to breastfeed the poor little guy. Even though I went through the following weeks waking every three hours at night to try to feed him, and spent the days trying to get him to take even a short nap. My partner was (and still is) extremely supportive during the whole time. He spent nights with me in the hospital, walking around with the baby just so I could get some sleep. He insisted on me resting while we combo-fed the baby (that means both formula and breast) while I recovered from my surgery and got my iron count back to normal. We took turns settling the little one to sleep during different periods of the day. My friends and my family were supportive during the early times. People would want to come by and visit, and not just to see the baby, but they would help by holding him, changing him, rocking him to sleep, bringing food for us…people would call and check in to see how I was doing. People would also e-mail because they didn’t want to call and wake the baby, or wake me. After the first six weeks, when I was given the a-ok by my OB/GYN, I made sure I went out every day for at least 20 min/day with the baby, even if it was just to go to Starbucks and get a chai frappuccino, or just to walk the dog. After three months, after the end of the colic, after finally realising which cry meant what, everything seemed to be cruising along just fine. Baby was sleeping through the night, I was getting enough rest, my partner had a 9 – 5 and would help with dinner, dishes, and other chores that I just couldn’t get to during the day. Sure I had those feelings of inadequacy during the first few weeks. But I would just look at my little guy and realise that I would just do my best, and no matter what that was, it would be my love for him that would guide me to do the right thing by him. The feelings of inadequacy would go away. And I had the support of friends, family, and most importantly, my partner, who was going through his own issues at the time, not only about fatherhood, but other personal issues, including a health issue that arose quite suddenly during the early months of our baby’s life. Everything seemed to be smooth sailing. We were (and still are) on an active schedule: Mom and Baby Swim, Mom and Baby Yoga, infant storytime at the library, infant playgroups at the Early Years Centres, and still a stop at the Evil Mermaid to get a chai latte (it’s December now not August!). I take my dog out for a nightly walk and leave the baby with my partner (when he’s here) so I get some sort of alone time. So what do I have to be depressed about? That’s the exact question I asked myself when I first began to realise that I was experiencing the baby blues once again; only this time, I can’t quite shake it. I can’t quite remember when I first started to go through these feelings of inadequacy again. I think it was around the time when I thought I was going to have to return to work in November. We still don’t have daycare and my partner just got his dream job, only it’s shift work, and since he’s the new guy he can’t exactly dictate when he wants to take shifts (which would be evenings and overnights so that he can look after the baby when I go back to work). So I began to feel anxious about what to do with my little one. I spoke with my boss, and we’ve agreed to extend my leave until January. So why am I still depressed? January isn’t that far off. And I’m going to miss seeing every waking moment of my little guy. I’m there when he wakes up from his daily 20 min naps, I know that he’s going to cry at 2:35 PM and at 11:35 AM and at 8:25 PM because he's teething now and that’s when his tooth pain mixes with his tiredness. I know that when he gets his sad face you blow raspberries on his belly and the sadness goes away instantly. If he’s really sad, then just have the dog walk in the room and he starts to laugh and reach for the dog. I don’t know how to explain this to my partner, when I leave him alone with the baby, never mind how I’m going to explain this to a daycare, when it’s not even in my own house? It’s not like I’ve never left him before. We’ve gone out and left him with babysitters. And he’s gotten along with them just fine. But of course, the longest we’ve ever left him with one was for about six hours. But six hours once in a while is not the same as eight hours five days a week. I’m going to miss his first steps. I’m going to miss seeing him stand on his own two feet without support for the very first time. So far, I haven’t missed any milestones and one of the key things that’s making me so upset is that I’m going to miss a bunch of them. I really wish I could afford to take the whole year off, but even then, when May comes around, I will still have this anxiety. There are milestones that I will still miss. In my logical mind, I can rationalize that I should not be sad, depressed or upset about any of this. If I speak with a counsellor, all they are going to do is try to get me to be logical about things, but I can tell myself all of that already. Is it a hormonal or chemical imbalance? Well, I’ve never been depressed to the point of requiring drugs before. I’ve always been able to move on with life when the worst things have happened. And this isn’t even a worse thing. It could be simply hormonal. Perhaps my hormones haven’t sorted themselves out yet, and I’ve gone back on the Pill so it’s adding hormones to hormones, and sending my mind spiralling into a dark place. I think it’s a combination of things. It’s the hormonal imbalance, it’s the sadness of missing those milestones, it’s losing my identity because I think it’s selfish to put my needs above my baby’s, which I know is not good for either me or my baby. It’s not hearing from people as much anymore, and chasing down people via e-mail and phone calls, people who were so concerned about me five months ago and who seem to forget that I exist, or can’t relate to me because I have a baby. It’s being alone at night now, not being able to sigh and relax with my partner because he’s at work. I can handle the baby stuff alone, but when I’m here afterwards, I miss him terribly because I can’t talk about just nothing so that my mind can relax. It’s not writing nearly enough even though I’ve had plenty of chances. I know I have to steal time, and that’s what I should do. I don’t always have to be sleep-deprived from worry. I don’t even have to be sleep-deprived. I’m writing now and the baby has woken up once, and I pressed CTRL-S and got up and looked after him and settled him back to sleep and came back and started writing again. Maybe I’m not using a pen and paper and I’ve lost that connection, but at this point, anything to get out the words and fears and feelings from my head onto the page will help me just fine. Maybe it's the new scream cry of pain that my baby has developed now that his teeth are protruding from his bottom gums, and there is nothing I can do to make it go away other than keep drugging the poor lad with Tylenol. I just don't know what to do. I know I should not feel like this. I feel like I'm screaming for attention by writing it on the blog (well, I guess any blog is a scream for attention, so that's not so strange, is it?), but part of me wants some attention for me. It's probably the only child in me... Anyway, it helps. It helps to get some of the thoughts down, even if when I look up from the screen, the baby will have woken up with tooth pain, and I'll be sitting here alone. I am grateful for these few minutes I've had to myself right now, though. That's the feeling I've been looking for for these past few days...just 10 minutes for a glass of wine, and some time to think, and some time to be glad for the things that I have in my life, even if they're not all in the room at the same time - good friends, a supportive partner who still puts my needs before his in spite of where his headspace is at the time (that's not a knock; he has a lot going on in his head right now), and a generally happy baby who just is in a lot of pain right now. We're both realising that the world is indeed a very big place.
11/23/2006 Cry it out?????"Baby can't sleep...let him cry it out!"
That's what most people still tell new moms these days. In fact, if you Google "baby sleep problems", you'll be directed to the baby care page in Australia that tells you that you should never nurse your baby to sleep because then they'll get used to it and manipulate you to keep doing it forever.
I think people believe that the "cry it out" philosophy also is better for boys than for girls, because it "toughens them up".
Recently, I had to participate in a new moms things held by the City of Toronto. One of the moms in there said that her 5 month old (who is only one week younger than Babycup) kept waking her through the night, asking to be fed. She said she'd had enough of feeding him - she's breastfeeding and she needs rest, apparently - so she reduced her feedings from four per nights (the baby was waking every 2 - 3 hours to be fed) to one per night, and decided to let her baby boy "cry it out" and go to sleep. She said (and I quote), "It's really difficult to listen to your baby cry for 20 minutes, but in the end, it works and he does pass out."
I cannot tell you how absolutely fucking enraged I was to hear this. But of course, you can't tell people how to raise their kids. But you can bitch about it on your blog, so here I go...
First of all, for all you "cry it out" people...have you ever felt insecure? Not doubtful of your abilities, such as, "I don't think I'll ever be able to bungee jump in the Rockies", but insecure such as, "I am 5'7" and 125 lbs. and my waist is 30" around. God, I am so fat." Or were/are you completely open with your parents/caregivers, or do you still feel that you have to hide things from them, and I'm not talking about Xmas gifts? Well, if you have ever had any of those symptoms, especially if you have no problem lying to your parents to keep them from finding out that you're not a 30-year-old virgin, that you've been smoking DuMaurier Specials for 20 years, or that you frequently spend each Friday night over the porcelain god after downing the better half of a brewery's inventory, then guess what? You were a baby who was left to "cry it out".
You learned at a very early age that your parents weren't to be trusted. You were cold, you were hungry, you were lonely, you were having a fucking bad day, and you just needed some big person to lift you up and say, "Shhhhhh...it's okay. I'm here for you." Babies cannot and do not know how to manipulate by crying. Babies don't have adult language - they have their own language which is not the crap you heard from that insane woman on Oprah. (My baby's first word was "hey" and it didn't mean he was cold. It meant "hey!")
Babies are very much like obnoxious American tourists. They like the comforts of home (the womb) and they don't really want to leave but someone tells them that there's a better place outside, so they go. And once they get to this new place, they realise that nobody speaks their language. So they yell, and yell, and yell, and yell, thinking that somehow this will make people understand that they're saying, "I'm hungry. Where is the McDonald's?" or "WASHROOM?!! WHERE IS THE WASHROOM??!!". When babies come out, the only language they have is the voice of crying. To them, "wah" means, "I'm hungry" and "Wah" means "I went poo" and "waah" means "I'm fucking cold - my external temperature dropped 30 degrees, what do you expect?". But to us, parents, babysitters, people who fear babies, and the rest, it all sounds the same. It's not our fault that we don't remember how to speak baby. It's like being born in New Brunswick, speaking perfect Acadian French, then coming to Toronto and having your French teacher tell you that it's not real, so you just stick to English and the only thing you can say in French today is "tabernacle".
When babies cry, they are trying to tell you something. They're not trying to manipulate you. They are trying to communicate, and it's up to us to figure it out. Even those times when a baby seems to cry for "no reason at all", they're just saying, "Hey, lady with the boobs, I'm having a bad day, and I want the world to fuck off and die." Babies are people too, after all.
Getting back to the crazy woman who now leaves her baby to cry for food at night...think about it. You're a baby getting yummy breast milk, that is designed to give you enough energy to get through 3 hours of your life at a time. If you get more out of it, great, but that's the average. So you get used to eating when you need to eat. Then, all of a sudden, you get your food source taken away. Well, damn it, you get hungry. And how do any of us feel when we are hungry and cannot eat at the time that our stomachs say, "Hello??!!". So the baby does what he normally does, he asks his mom for food. But he can't say, "Can we have a can of frosting for lunch?" All he can do is use the language available to him, and says "wah". Well, mom, aka food source, says she needs sleep, so she stays sleeping. Baby says, "wahh", which means, "Hello??!!! Hungry here. Lady with the boobs, where are you?" Mom doesn't respond. So the baby goes into obnoxious American tourist mode. And when he's screaming his head off, and his stomach is growling, and nobody's coming to help him, after about 20 minutes (which is about the same length of time that the tourist will take to try to get through to the "foreigners"), he says, "You're not coming? Well fuck you, then. You fucking hate me that much? Fuck you, bitch." and falls asleep because he's out of energy, and when the body is out of energy, what does it do??
Personally, I want my baby boy to feel comfortable knowing that he can rely on me. Sure, sometimes he cries in his sleep, and sometimes he needs to be left for a couple of minutes until he falls asleep.Sometimes, though, it's something serious, like teething, or itchy eczema, or acid reflux, or a nightmare (yes babies have nightmares - come on, leaving the womb is the most traumatic experience any of us ever have). I slowly go to him, tell him that it's okay, give him a pat, and listen to what he says, er, cries. Someday, he may need to come to me with a big problem. At least he'll know that I'll always be there for him, and that he can trust me as much as I trust him now. Seriously, what's a few hours of lost sleep now because of some crying, versus hours and days of lost sleep when he's a teenager, up to god-knows-what god-knows-where? At least I know that he'll be more than likely to tell me what he's up to later on, since I want to know what he's up to right now. :-)
10/18/2006 Just listen to the Lost GenerationI'm not sure if I belong to Generation X, Generation Y, or Generation stuck-in-the-middle. I do know that as a kid, we got the best TV shows and were a part of the greatest revolution in modern rock history, so much so that the kids today are still listening to this music, and claiming it as their own. (CBGB's rest in peace...moment of silence please).
I do know that our generation is currently in our 30s, and are witnessing some of the most shocking and appalling behaviour coming from the children of this generation that has ever been seen (well since the 16th century). I think what makes this behaviour more shocking is that we knew that we were capable of doing the same things (thanks to repeated readings of Lord of the Flies) but we would never dream of acting on those impulses. And that's due to a little thing called discipline, something that is seriously lacking in our society today.
As you all know, I'm a parent. And I love my Babycup. And I could not even think of bringing harm to him. After all, right now, he's only 4 1/2 months, and does not even understand the concept of evil, bad, misbehaving...everything he does is motivated out of living in the moment. Really, it's how we all should live. But one day, he is going to start testing what he can and can't get away with, especially after hanging out with other kids, be it in daycare, playgroup, or watching TV. (Yes, I let the baby watch TV. We'll get to what makes a bad mother in a moment.) And one day I will have to let him know that he's crossed a boundary or two. And if that means a little swat on the bum, it means a little swat on the bum. It didn't do us any harm, though the hippies would have you believe otherwise. I'm not saying I'm going to send Babycup out back to cut his own switch and use it on him, but I am saying that "corporal punishment" isn't as bad as everyone thinks it is. After all, when you were 8 years old, did you tie up a 14 year old kid with spina bifida in a shed and set him on fire because he wasn't cool like you? Did a thought like that even enter your head when you were 8? (And if it did, did you get sent to psychiatrist after psychiatrist in the hopes that someone would find out why you would ever entertain such thoughts? Hope you're enjoying your prison cell as you read this, then...and if you're not in prison, you will be soon. Unless of course you're Dexter Morgan.)
Swats on the bum taught us to have respect for other people. A stern "no" made us think twice before we threw toys at the head of an unsuspecting child. Last week, when Babycup and I were at playgroup, a child who was 14 months old (this was a group for 0 - 18 months) took a mallot and threw it at Babycup. The child's mother wearily called his name, and did nothing else to dissuade the child from performing the act again. Like I said last time, you can't tell people how to raise their kids. I did give the woman a dirty look and all she did was give her son a hug. It doesn't take a genius to see that she just reinforced his negative behaviour by telling him it was all right.
Now I understand what the hippies mean when they say that you shouldn't use negative language with children. After all, if you say "no" enough to a child, the word loses its meaning, and you have a toddler running around shouting "NO!" all the time and laughing at you and next thing you know the kid is smacking all the other kids and adults in the playgroup. However...a stern voice with a very pointed explanation should be enough to put the fear of God into the kid so that he/she knows not to even think about doing something like that again. People find it easier to discipline boys rather than girls because "girls are cute and innocent". By the way, did I mention that the 8 year olds who burned the kid were little girls? Speaking as a girl myself, girls need more discipline than boys because girls learn very quickly that they can get away with murder if they give someone the right cute look.
Again, I'm not saying that kids should be beaten with canes. But a swat on the bum and a very stern voice and look will do the trick. And I'm not the only person who feels this way - this entry stems from a conversation I had yesterday with people my own age, who were equally appalled at the behaviour of those children. We all agreed that the reason why kids are so awful these days is because they aren't being disciplined, and we agreed that kids still need a little swat now and again to keep them in line.
So what about those claims of "if you hit me, mom, I'll call the police"? A swat on the bum is not abuse. A stern telling off is not abuse. Children need to be told the difference between discipline and abuse. In our quest to be politically correct and get over our own psychoses about how our parents treated us and how our grandparents treated our parents, we're losing sight of what respect and fear really mean. We are losing the respect of our children. Our children no longer fear nor respect authority. And that's what discipline is all about.
You're only a bad parent if you don't discipline your kids. If your kid is the 8 year old who burns someone alive, then yes, you've been a bad parent. No child is born as Damien. Babies are not evil. Children learn to be evil if they are not told that being evil is wrong. Like the woman who hugged her kid after he threw a mallot at my kid's head...that's being a bad parent. The kid didn't need a hug. He needed to be told that you don't throw things at little babies. Whether in public or in private, the discipline needs to be reinforced. Discipline is not about being embarrassed. You should not be embarrassed by your children; after all, they are just a reflection of you. If you're embarrassed by something that they are doing, let them know. Don't save it for later. Kids are pretty smart - they will let you know where they've picked up their behaviour, if it's from you or their friends or your friends...and explain to them what's right and what's wrong. Providing boundaries for kids give them a sense of security. No boundaries = insecurity, and so they act out. Don't believe me? Then go speak to the parents of the kids who burnt the 14 year old alive. Sure, they'll say they're good parents, because, like I said, you can't tell people how to raise their kids.
So call me a bad mother for letting Babycup watch TV. At least my kid will know respect for others, and will have his boundaries enforced and reinforced. And he won't be burning any other kids alive, that's for sure.
10/10/2006 Beware of LabelsYou know, Keedz, I don't claim to be an expert at parenting. After all, I've only been at it for a few months. And I'm having a blast. And we all know that you can't tell people how to raise their children. Anyone with a kid, even a crack whore, will tell you that they're the best parent who ever existed.
To be truthful, I won't say that. All I can do is promise to be the best parent I can to my kid, and treat him like a little human being instead of a little puppet or pet or some other toy or trifle.
Which leads me to my rant of today...
As part of my goal in being a good parent to Babycup, we have a social life that would make Paris Hilton jealous. Well, not really, but it's certainly busier than mine was before his arrival (as you can see by the infrequency of my posts these days). We have playgroups 3 days a week, mom and baby yoga one morning a week, a mom and stroller walking group, a baby storytime group at the library, and our daily routine of going to the Evil Mermaid to get mommy one of those fancy non-coffee frappuccino things made with chai liquid.
Today we were at a playgroup, and I was sitting in a corner, chilling with Babycup while I fed him. Another mom had her baby on the ground in front of her, and he looked over. I gave the kid a smile. In answer, his mother said, "Well, we know it's rude to stare, but we won't tell you that just yet because babies just stare." At first I thought she was talking to me, until I realised that she hadn't even noticed me...she was saying that to her baby. It made me wonder just when she was going to start teaching her child that it's rude for him to try to learn in this world. Call me oversensitive, but these are the people who end up shutting their kids down as they try to express themselves, and then they wonder why their kid never came to them with their problems. For those of you who have never been exposed to kids, well, yes, they stare. But they're not staring to be rude or anything. Imagine (or try to remember if you have that good of a memory) that you have never seen anything in the world before, and then all of a sudden, you can see. Wouldn't you stare at everything in the world, because it would all be so new, so wonderful, so incredible? Add to this that your eyes are just learning how to focus, so that you have to fix your gaze on an object for a little while in order to see it clearly. That's what babies do when they "stare". In fact, that's what toddlers and older kids are doing when they "stare" too - they're just trying to learn about what they're seeing, about what's going on. So when you tell a kid that "it's rude to stare", what you're actually telling them is "it's impolite for you to try to find out about this world, so stay in your shell and don't express yourself."
But like I said, maybe I'm being oversensitive. After all, I've only been a parent for a few months (and a few weeks less than this woman).
Then there was the other woman today who called her 3 month old "lazy" because he wouldn't lift his head on cue. Sure, she said it was a joke, that she was just teasing, but it's still a label. Babies might not understand the word association yet, but they understand sentiments from the time that they start moving inside your womb (well not your womb, if you're a man, but I'm sure you get my drift). Calling your child "lazy", "slow", "chubby"...using these negative labels will only diminish a child's self-esteem. Babies by nature cannot be lazy. If they are slower in their motor skills, it's possible that there is something physically wrong with them, and this is their way of showing you. Or, and the more likely explanation is, all babies develop at different paces. Some of them do things quicker than yours does, and sometimes yours does other things quicker than they do. For example, Babycup can talk. He loves to talk. He says "hey" and "hi" and "la la" and "mam" and "quixote"...ok I'm lying about "quixote", but to me, he talks. He likes to babble and laugh. There are many babies his age who don't talk or babble but just coo and gurgle. But those same babies can roll on their tummies. Babycup can't quite roll over yet, but that doesn't make him lazy, slow, or incompetent. He just isn't ready to do that yet. And when he finally does it, he might not do it every day. That still doesn't make him lazy. Rolling over to a young baby is like running a marathon for us adults - it's a great feat, an incredible achievement, and something that we just don't do every day. I can't run a marathon, but does that make me lazy? Maybe to some people, but to those people, I say, take your label and shove it up your ass.
Keedz, if you have kids of your own, or if you have younger people in your house, remember - the joke that you make today is the pain dumped on the psychiatric couch tomorrow. Our kids need to have positive influences, high self-esteem, and they need to be happy. Labelling starts as easily as these mothers' comments demonstrate, starting before babies can even ask the question, "Why are you saying that?".
But like I said before, and I'll say again, what do I know about being a parent? What do I know about what's good for babies and what isn't? After all, I've only been at this for a few months. 9/18/2006 The BecomingI fear I'm turning into one of them...one of those women whom I loathe...the woman who always gives advice. It's completely unintentional. People are asking for advice, and, well, I'm giving it. At least I'm waiting until I'm asked, though, unlike a lot of women who just feel that they know everything and have to let you know that you don't.
The worst culprit is the new-but-not-as-new-as-you mom: "Oh my kid is 8 months old and yours is 4 so I know way more than you and so I'm going to tell you how your kid will be." Oh really? You KNOW what my kid will be like in 4 months? Are you a psychic with a crystal ball? Because every single baby is exactly the same? Kee-rist, keedz. If you ever decide to have kids, or if you have kids already, watch out for these women. They're usually Amazonian in ego size, and they usually haven't lost their pregnancy fat even after 16 months of 1000 crunches a day (or so they tell you as you see them sneak out of Tim's with another giant box of Timbits. Seriously - stand near the Timmy Hos near my home and you'll see them struggling to get their asses into the door more than they struggle with their strollers).
I'll tell you the advice that I've been giving to people, though I realise the irony here because I know you didn't ask me for it. I mean, what the fuck do I know about being a mom? I've only been doing it for 4 months (well, some people count pregnancy, too, so that would only make it 13 months). The only thing I know for certain is that every child is different. And because they are different, they should not be compared against each other as if they're in competition for Baby Idol. Your kid sleeps from 9PM - 9AM at six weeks old? Congratufuckinlations. Maybe my kid doesn't. Why are you trying to make me feel bad? Then again, I guess I shouldn't feel too bad because I only gained 23 lbs. in pregnancy and you gained 70. And I'm staying away from the T-Hos. Honestly, keedz, that's how petty things get. And we want to know why our moms fucked us up when we were younger?
Don't get me wrong. I totally understand parental pride, and I totally understand the absolute need to show off your kid. But to do so while putting down someone else and their kid is beyond petty, whether it be intentional or not. There's a big difference between "I was lucky because Adrianna always slept at night" versus "You mean your kid isn't sleeping through the night at 7 weeks?"
Every human being on the planet is different. We are all individuals, even if we choose to follow sheeplike professions like Accounting. So why don't we see our babies as individuals? What's the rush to get them to conform to whatever standards that society places on them - sleeping through the night at six weeks, eating solid food at six months, potty trained at 15 months, etc. ? If you have a stressful day, do you sleep well at night? Why would you expect your baby to? What stresses do babies have, you might ask? Well, for starters, a simple change in routine - spending all day out when they're not used to it, or vice versa - you spent all day inside because it was raining/snowing. A baby doesn't know the difference in the weather, but he/she does know that they're not outside. So they fuss and cry and get bent out of shape and then they can't sleep and we wonder what the fuck is wrong with them? Laugh now, but how many of you can't start your day without your first cup of Joe? What would you do if the world suddenly ran out of coffee? Bet you'd scream and howl, too.
By trying to shape our kids too early, we don't allow their own personalities to develop. By trying to make them like other babies, we don't let them become individuals. We turn them into the sheep we will dress them up as for Hallowe'en.
Don't get me wrong - I'm not a hippie-dippie "let your kids do what they want forever" kind of parent. The rulebook will come down with a bang once Babycup hits the toddler years. But what will make that stage easier is knowing and understanding his personality from the start. That and not comparing his achievements to those of others, but just to be proud of the things he accomplishes on his own. He will stand out for who he is and who he will become.
If you want to keep comparing your kid with mine, if that honestly makes you feel better...well good for you. Just stop bitching about your pregnancy gut or else I'll gladly post those pics of you with the Maple Walnut Cruller in your mouth on the Net for the world to see... 8/10/2006 This Issue of NamingThere are very few things that get me pissed off as much as people telling me what's right and what's wrong for my kid. Some woman stopped me on the street the other day and told me that my baby was getting "too much sun" and that I needed to throw a wool blanket over his head. At the time, my baby was wearing a big, floppy hat, had full-length sleeves and pant legs, and had the cover on the top of the stroller over his entire body. Did I mention that it was 32 degrees Celcius out with a humidex of 42 degrees? The only thing sticking out were his toes, which had just appeared from under the tray because he was stretching as her stupid squeaky voice had woken him up out of a restful and much-needed nap. I held back the urge to run her over with my stroller, especially since her dog had attacked my dog earlier in the week, and merely said, "I'm nearly home."
In that same vein, I have been asked several times (okay not necessarily several, but enough times to warrant a nasty entry on the Hangout) about what kind of "naming ceremony", for lack of a better term, that we'd be having for Babycup. Would he be Baptised, Christened, have a briss, be placed in the middle of a pentagram with pig's blood, taken to the mosh pit at a Nine Inch Nails concert...
Well, let me tell you. We're not doing anything.
(I can hear the crickets chirping as the silence of shock fills the internet.)
It's pretty simple, really. Why would I, a very happy lapsed Catholic, whose mother was Muslim and whose late husband was Jewish, impose a religion on my child that I don't even practice? Why would I force him into doing something that he had no choice in (other than bathtime and brushing his teeth when they come in)? As an "insurance policy", in case for some reason the great big meteor hanging out in the Milky Way decides it's time to crash into the planet, and thus allowing my kid to get into some type of heaven that I don't even know exists? As a way to get yet more presents and fruit out of people? As a way of showing off my kid to the world and possibly drowning him in holy water (or a swimming pool representing same) in front of a crowd in order to satisfy my Munchhausen tendencies?
Long before Babycup was a twinkling in my eye, but just after my biological clock started its midday Westminister chime, I decided that I was not going to raise my child under any form of organized religion, right from the start. A lot of people say the same thing as I did, but they still end up having the christening/briss/baptism, saying that they'll give their child the choice "later". Well, I don't want to wait until "later". If he chooses to follow this insane religion that my parents forced unto me (and literally it was forced. I was baptised and was a happy little camper for 12 years until my parents suddenly realised that I had to get confirmed, and I hadn't even had a First Communion yet...talk about a rush job...), then he can get baptized at age 25 or at whatever age he decides to "find religion". Hell, if he wants to have a briss, he can do it then too - I even left him with that option (though I'll leave it up to his male friends to tell him that girls think "the puppet show" is cool!).
Now for all you people about to get on my ass about not teaching my child 'about religion', well, I can teach him about all religions, and teach him spirituality, instead of getting hung up on meaningless ceremonies and the hypocrisy and politics of organized religion. For example, how would you explain to a child that, when you commit an action that hurts another human being (like, say, for instance, murder) one religion says you are going straight to H-E-double-hockey-sticks while another one says if you tell some guy wearing a backwards collar sitting in a dark closet with a screen separating you from him, then it's okay and you'll still go upstairs in the clouds to meet the big guy. Hell, you can even commit serial murder, and confess every single one of them, and you'll still be saved. As a child, I found that confusing, and as an adult, from seeing all the things that have happened over the years in my church, from the stuff with little boys to Thorn Bird-like activity with parishoners and Mel Gibson, it makes my head spin faster than Linda Blair's did when the priests showed up in her room.
All I'd like to do is teach my kid how to live a good life being good to himself and to other people. If he chooses to fulfill his destiny with some form of organized worship, no matter where he may find it, that will be his choice. But at least his choice will be an informed one, and not one based on getting the coolest and largest amount of presents or money. And the only time he'll get water poured on his head as a baby is during bathtime. Though we may just go down and get a few cupcakes from The Cupcake Shoppe with his name iced on top just to celebrate the fact that he has a cool name, and because their cupcakes are just so damn good...
7/27/2006 Taking the capable out of handicappedHello there keedz! I have 5 minutes (well maybe longer) to rant about something that I have recently discovered that is pissing me off. Aren't you surprised?
Well, Babycup is 2 months old now, and he's getting big. He's gained 5 lbs. in 2 months. Who needs weight training when you have a baby? Seriously.
As a result of Babycup's size, and since Buttercup is not a big girl (definitely not anymore - tip for anyone considering motherhood: breastfeed if for no other reason than to lose the weight you've gained over 30+ years on your hips, thighs, and buttocks in less than 60 days. It's the best diet ever - you can eat more food and lose weight! Fuck Jenny Craig, I say!) it is extremely difficult for me to carry this kid in a sling, snugli, or any other such appendage made to carry your baby to promote closeness and to soften the shock of leaving the womb. Call me a bad mother - whatever. I use a bassinette and a stroller and do combo feeding (breast and formula). I put my baby in the infant chair when I have to pee. I'm sorry, but my arms and my back are just not that strong. Anyway, my venomous sarcasm is causing me to digress...
Because I can't carry the baby everywhere in the snugli, I use a stroller that's about the width of your average wheelchair to cart him around. It's a Graco Quattro Deluxe stroller, if you must know, which is obviously from America because it's made for kids up to 50 lbs. in size. If your kid is 50 lbs. and still can't walk on his own, then it could be one of several things: (1) the only thing that stops your kid from crying is shoving Mickey D's fries in his mouth; (2) the kid has a pituitary problem (which actually does happen - look at Andre the Giant if you don't believe me); or (3) you're just fucking lazy about walking with your kid and are also hoping that they teach potty training in Grade One. So why do I have this stroller? Reason no. 2. The Boy is HUGE. The baby is his son. The baby outgrew his newborn outfits in 4 weeks. Need I say more?
So when I walk around with this stroller, it's like I'm pushing a wheelchair. As a result, I've come to study and learn quite quickly just how wheelchair accessible this city really is. And guess what, keedz? It ain't. Well, it's more accessible than it was when I was Babycup's age, but people grumble about the accessibility more. Or they just find the elevators, ramps, and push button doors encourage their asses to double in size, so they put on their lazy hats and overuse the services provided for wheelchair patrons until they're broken, so that real wheelchair users (and stroller pushers) are stuck having no access to wheelchair-accessible services.
But that's not all. This city, in its infinite wisdom, is overhauling its entire public transit system (save for streetcars) to ensure that all subway stops and most bus stops are wheelchair accessible. Unfortunately (or fortunately depending on how you look at it), the project will be completed when I'll be in a wheelchair. Right now, if I were to take the subway for example, there are only certain stops where I can enter and exit using the wheelchair access. If there is a specific stop where I need to exit and it's not accesible, then I'm SOL, or I'm carrying this fucking stroller up stairs and trying to push it through a turnstyle that it can't fit through. That kinda defeats the purpose of having an accessible system, but, to their credit, the city is trying to rectify this as quickly as possible on the main subway line (that would be the Yonge line and not the Bloor/Danforth line, which we all know sucks big rocks
What does piss me off are the new buses, well, not the buses themselves, but the drivers of the new buses. The new wheelchair-accessible buses are kneeling buses that lower to the ground and then have a ramp open up so that a person in a wheelchair can roll onto the lower floor, and then park their chair up front near the driver. The buses can also kneel when they're not picking up wheelchairs. They can kneel any time you press the kneeling button. You see, I know this; I've seen the buses do this. I've seen some drivers do this. However, most of the drivers on the routes that I have to now take when I'm pushing the stroller have decided that I'm young and strong enough to hoist a 50 lb. stroller and a 12 lb. baby easily onto the bus without the need for it to be lowered. What. The. Fuck. Seriously. It takes 2 seconds to press the fucking button and lower the bus, not just for me but for the elderly who have problems stepping up, people with crutches, people with carts...the list goes on. But you would think that you're asking the driver to give you $50,000 and a pint of blood when you have to ask them to lower the bus floor because you're just not strong enough to hoist 65 lbs 10 inches in the air. And they sigh. And they give me the dirty look, as if to say, "You shouldn't be toting around that thing in the first place." And the worst part of it all is that female drivers are less likely to lower the bus than male drivers. It's as if they're telling me "Well I had to hoist my kid and now so do you." Fuck you, bitch. I'm paying your fucking salary with my ticket purchase. You work for me. Lower my fucking bus for me and my kid now.
The other big joke about access are most of the buildings and shopping centres in the city. They say they're wheelchair accessible but you have to go to one end or the other of the mall to find the elevator. It's rare to find an elevator in the middle of the mall (except for the Eaton Centre, and even then, they have signs on the elevator saying "allow patrons in wheelchairs and/or who use strollers to enter and exit the elevators first". Do you think the walking upright fuckers do that? Oh hell no. We have to practically run the fuckers over in order to get into the fucking elevators.). But the best are these buildings who claim to be wheelchair accessible and then have the bare minimum of access for them.
Take Indigo at the Manulife Centre. (Yes I'm going to name places - fuck it.) The entrance off of Bay Street seems to indicate that the store is accessible to wheelchairs. But once you enter through those doors, there is only one small elevator that can barely hold a wheelchair on that floor that allows patrons to travel up only and to one floor only, and it's accessible only with a key so that patrons with strollers are not allowed to use the elevator. If you want to go downstairs, you have to do one of things - you have to either get the staff to let you use the elevator and go up one floor and then wheel out to the main Manulife Elevator and go down two floors, or you have to go back outside, find the wheelchair ramp for the entrance to the Manulife Centre, follow the path around until you get to the revolving door and then realise that you can't actually enter the Manulife through the main doors - you have to enter through Jacob. Now if you're a big burly man in a wheelchair, I'm sure the last store you want to go into is Jacob. But it's the only way in for a wheelchair patron. And then once you go through Jacob, you are on the lower level of Indigo, but if you want to get to the bottom level, you still have to exit the store and take the main Manulife Centre elevators down one floor. Let me tell you, keedz - that was a royal pain in the arse to discover.
I realise these stores will come back and say that they're trying their best. I'm sure they are. And, to their credit, they're better than 45% of the stores in the city - any older stores have either had to open their freight elevators to wheelchairs or are in the midst of building something or are just relying on patrons to find the main mall elevators and don't really give a shit about consumers in wheelchairs or consumers with small babies. I mean, I do have the option of trying to balance the stroller on the escalator (which I have done and it's not a fun thing to do at all), but what about the people in wheelchairs? And what happens when the escalators are those new, really narrow ones that barely fit my newly-skinny ass, never mind my stroller? I'm as stuck as the wheelchair patrons.
So do us a favour, City of Toronto - stop patronizing people in wheelchairs. If you're making these shopping centres and main buildings wheelchair accessible, then make sure that the buildings have clear wheelchair routes indicated in the stores. Make sure that the entire store is completely accessible (a good example is H&M at the Eaton Centre), and make sure that the elevators hold more than just the width of one chair. And tell your TTC drivers who are driving the kneeling buses that women with strollers are people, too. Remind them about how precious babies are, and that maybe they should lower the bus without asking so that the babies aren't jostled around like a very dry gin martini.
In the meantime, should you need to know exact wheelchair access maps, routes, and schematics for most of the buildings in the downtown core, leave me a comment. I'll be happy to send you directions. Just know that it was easier to find the treasure in the Pirates of the Caribbean movies than it is to find wheelchair access points in most of the buildings in the city.
6/21/2006 Coveting sleep and philosophyHey Keedz! I know, it's been a while...but that's what happens when you give birth. The creature that lived within becomes a reality, and reality takes on a whole new meaning when you're staring at its crying face at 2:30 AM.
I'm not going to bore you with the whole traumatic birth story - this isn't a horror site (or a kink site for those of you with birth fetishes, and I know there are a lot of you. Sometimes, we shouldn't thank God for google.com) . Let's just say that they got Babycup out, and Babycup is a boy, and somehow they managed to do that without killing either of us in the process.
Things are settling down a bit - as you can see, I actually have 5 minutes to write to all of you and tell you that this whole motherhood thing isn't so bad. Actually, it is so bad. It's the best thing and the worst thing that I've ever been through. When things get so bad they're delirious, I just look into those violet/brown/blue eyes (we don't have confirmation of the colour yet) and remember that I put every single cell save one into that child, and that he is truly a miracle, and I smile.
You know, I got the most obnoxious phone call the other day (and for those of you afraid to call, why do you think they have voice mail? If I don't answer, I'll get your message. My kid sleeps through anything - from loud construction noises to explosions from action films to people screaming at 2AM. The only thing that wakes him up is when he gets hungry. Seriously. He will sleep soaking wet and won't budge but his stomach gurgles and you'd better be there right away with some type of nipple, real or artificial, that produces food. Ah, he takes after his mother's heart...) from someone who shall remain nameless but they are a close relative of mine. They asked how I was, and then how the baby was, but they asked it like this, "How's the baby? Miserable?" And I will tell you, I got really pissed. "What do you mean, miserable?" (this is a relative I can't swear at, unfortunately.) "Well, some babies are just miserable," they said. "Well, then if people feel that way about their babies, then they just shouldn't have them," I replied.
And it's true. Sure, it's frustrating at first when you're trying to figure out what each and every single cry means, because they all sound the same, just like most Asian languages sound to the untrained North American ear. Soon, though, just as if you were to immerse yourself into one particular Asian culture, you learn to differentiate the cries - babies have an incredibly diverse communication system, believe it or not. They don't just cry - they use their eyes, hands, feet - it's up to us parents to read the signals correctly.
And then, babies also dream. And my baby happens to talk in his sleep, like his mother (or so say most of the people I've slept with), so I had to learn over the past few weeks when the cry was a real cry or when it was a dream cry. But learning all of this is the coolest thing I've ever done. Seriously. Misery doesn't even enter into the picture.
So you miss a bit of sleep - you learn very quickly how to survive on 3 hours/night, and learn that a 4th or 5th hour is a complete luxury. But I can sleep more when I'm dead. So you forget whether it's 5AM or 5PM - time doesn't matter because it's flying by faster than it ever did before you had a creature running around (and Blind Date is on at both 5AM and 5PM in this market so I only know it's 5 o'clock these days). These are minutes that I will never get back, so I want to take them all in now. So the house is a disaster - but who's coming to visit? Well, if you are, and you complain about the state of my apartment, then you can do me a fucking favour and clean it up. Seriously. I have better things to do like make sure my baby is happy, full, and dry. There are no biological hazards in the house - it's just unkempt, and I never did ever have my place very kempt in the first place.
Miserable? To be honest, I think I'd be more miserable if I didn't have this little boy in my life than I could ever be with him in it - even if at the age of 13 he's going to tell me exactly what he thinks of me. No matter. I think I finally understand this whole unconditional love thing - I thought I did before, but it's very different when the person you love will always be a part of you, literally. 5/25/2006 It's TimeHey Keedz! Long time no speak. Sorry to be so out of touch, but things have been a little crazy, and they're about to get a whole lot crazier.
This morning at around 4:47 AM, my water broke. I can see you all now, picturing this major waterfall coming from between my legs, with lots of crying, screaming, and gnashing of teeth; with everyone in the house woken up by the sounds of panic, me being hustled into a car, driven to the hospital whilst breathing funny, and, one soft focus wipe or vertical wipe later, holding a screaming Babycup in my arms.
That, Keedz, is for soaps. Right now, it's 10:15 AM, and I'm sitting here in front of the computer, writing my last entry as a free woman. Yes it's been over five hours since the "incident"...I'm calm, relaxed and relatively free of pain, except for once an hour where I get this cramp thing. I was told to stay home for a little while longer, and head down just after lunch to get checked out (where they're probably going to send me home again until just before The Ultimate Fighter 3 starts tonight because it's Thursday and that's what I've been watching on a regular basis these past few weeks).
It's strange to sit here, at my desk, realising that, in a few hours (relatively speaking - this could take up to 48 of them) my life will no longer be my own at all. Not that it has been since this whole thing started way back in September. But the physical reality of it all will be handed to me in the form of a crying little one asking to be looked after. It's weird, huh, how life can just change in a matter of hours.
Overall, the whole thing has been like it was this morning, when my water broke. I thought I had to pee, I was turning to do so, got a cramp, and whoosh! I thought I wet the bed because it was cold and I didn't want to get out so quickly. Of course, it didn't stop there. I waddled to the bathroom and realised that, well, it wasn't pee. And it kept coming. But it didn't hurt, and I wasn't scared. I just made the requisite phone call to the Maternity unit at my hospital, where they patched me through to a nurse who was having a laugh with her co-workers, and was very calm. Because she was calm, I stayed calm. I had a nice shower, and then I went back to bed for a couple of hours. Keedz, I'm going to be awake longer than Jack Bauer today, so I might as well take advantage. Then I got up, sent out a few e-mails, had breakfast, because I am ravenous as fuck (please don't think I'm gonna stop swearing just because I have a kid. Puh-lease!), and now I'm writing to all of you.
Life isn't always about the drama; it shouldn't be. At times like this, the drama seems so unimportant. It's about having the strength and stamina to make it through the day, and to make sure that the day is a good one overall. Sure, today is going to be all about me, apparently, but really, it's not. I'm just a conduit for the real star of the day.
So I'm calm. I'm relaxed. My camera's battery is nearly dead and I can't find the fucking charger. My bags are packed and I don't have any cash on me for the vending machines. It's not going to be a perfect day, but it's the imperfections that give us the memories. I'm going to enjoy every single moment of calm, of pain, of whatever the day brings me, because, at the end of it all, life picks up and goes on.
Wish me luck, Keedz - I just hope my insides don't get torn in half. And if they do, oh well... :) 4/23/2006 Just put some clothes on...I really don't know where this is coming from...maybe it's coming from my hormones as they get ready to take on the Herculean task of nagging a child for the next 20 years. Maybe it's coming from my newfound confidence in my body, in spite of the big belly that sticks out and says hello to everyone I meet. Or maybe it's always been in there and I've been just too nice until now...
Spring is here. The weather is getting nicer. People have shed their winter baggy sweaters in favour of form-fitting cottons and poly blends. Being with child as I am, I've also noticed that many women who find themselves in similar predicaments to myself are also shedding the big coats, proud to show their bellies to the world. And there's nothing wrong with that, really. The last set of pics I took of Babycup and I show off the belly in one of those artistic portrait ways.
And then I went out on the streets last week, when it was up to 21*C (that's still cold for you LA lot but for us it's an April heatwave). And it just seemed like every heinous, orange-peeled and cottage-cheese-skinned person decided to let it all hang out. And I mean all.
Some people are very happy with their bodies, and they think that the world needs to see all of their glory, so they wear g-strings and mini skirts and belly tops...but, as they say at the nude beach, usually the people who are nude are the ones you scream at and say "go inside!". Now, again, it could just be me and my sensitive vision - after all, when you're pregnant, all of your senses become heightened. You can smell the second when your co-worker's deodorant begins to die. You can hear the loud, stomping steps of the impatient fast walker behind you, who pushes you out of the way to go past, and then, looking back to give you a dirty stare for walking like a slow penguin, realises that, um, oops, there's an actual reason why you're walking that way. So maybe my eyes (and my stomach) are just overly sensitive to cellulite hanging down from below the hemline of a thick chick's miniskirt.
But possibly the worst thing I saw last week was at the OB/GYN clinic. This woman, also with child, stood in front of me in the ultrasound line wearing a non-maternity t-shirt and non-maternity jeans that hung below her belly like a 50-year-old man trying to wear his 30-year-old size 28 jeans, leaving her belly exposed. And her belly looked like the skin of a blood orange, between the pock marks and the stretch marks.
Now before you all jump down my throat on being superficial and mean, and lecture me on how true beauty comes from within, just let me explain. Of all people, I am the last person to say who should be deemed as a societal outcast based on body type and body shape. My issue is with the way that some people highlight and are proud to show off their (for lack of a better word) "flaws". You can have the worlds worst cottage cheese on your thighs and ass (*looks away*) but you can look absolutely hot and sexy and wonderful if you know how to dress right. A pair of tight yoga pants, a cute shirt that cuts at the hipline to distract from the cheese, and voila. People will line up for your phone number.
I have no problem with public nudity, in ad campaigns, in crazy people on the street, on the beach, go for it. Hell, I'm planning on breastfeeding in public now that Toronto threw out its topless rule. But if my boobs start to look like empty shells of their once perky selves, and I know that nobody wants to see that, I'm perfectly happy to go into another room and feed Babycup. And people who know they have horrifying stretch marks and pock marks should just cover that shit up. You can get cheap and nice Maternity Clothes at Motherhood and at Old Navy, fer chrissakes. Wear a full-length dress. Put on a burlap potato sack. But for fuck's sake, take some pride in your appearance, cottage cheese ladies. Don't make us feel embarassed for the rest of you. And for God's sake, stop showing that shit to my kid. It just ain't right.
4/12/2006 The Lure of Reality TVSo. There are six weeks to go with Babycup, and as you can imagine, I'm not so spry on my feet as I once was. It's too bad, because it's starting to get nice out and I want to take longer strolls with the dog and enjoy Canadian patio weather (which would make all you wusses in LA cry and cry and cry...) So. I'm stuck inside most nights, watching more television that my unborn child should be exposed to. Now I've made no bones about the fact that I am a television addict. I learned to walk because of television (yes thank goodness they didn't have remote controls back then, when dinosaurs roamed the earth, or else I'd still be stuck on that couch in that apartment, just another statistic of the obesity problem in society). TV and I have a relationship unparalleled - I love TV more than Homer Simpson loves TV. After all, TV is always here, even when nobody else is...
But sometimes, like in all relationships, TV can be really annoying. Now, not so annoying that you want it to go away completely, but just enough to make you say "what the fuck?!!". And that, most of the time, is how I react to Reality TV. Now I don't watch a lot of Reality TV to be honest, and here's why...Reality TV is about as real as the WWE (that's wrestling for those of you who don't follow my links to the side). And then I fall for it, hook, line and sinker. I get caught up with the cast of characters, I fall for the sweet one, I laugh at the funny one, I adore the bitchy one...and then I know who's going to win but I just keep hoping that somewhere, someone gets some sense and votes for the right person to win instead of the cute person. But I'm not stupid. I know the world is controlled by 14 year old girls. I was one once, and I loved the power that it gave me!!!
Tonight, I watched the finale of the MuchMusic VJ Search. And it wasn't the greatest reality show. The characters, or contestants, or whatever they're called, were pretty generic, vying for a coveted spot as a Much VJ. But I became addicted to the light of hope in these young folks eyes. And, having grown up with Much, as a viewer, I know what to me counts as a good VJ (George Stromboulopoulous, Bill Welychka, Michael Williams) and what counts as a very bad VJ (pretty well everyone else not mentioned). But of course that doesn't matter to the viewing public of 14 year old girls. They just want someone cute to stare at for four or more hours who may totally suck at the job and have to get trained and retrained so that he can count past 21 without taking his clothes off.
So after all the hard work that the VJ hopefuls put in, after all the time and research and bitchy fighting, after coming down to the last 2 candidates, the perfect candidate and then Cute Boy, the decision was left to the general public. And, as usual, the general public chose the cute one. Not the talented one, the one who could do the job properly, but the cute one. Just like on Canadian Idol. Just like on any other reality show where the voting public has the final say (with the possible exception of American Idol where every other season they happen to choose the most talented one). And the kids know how to hack the internet so they load up the votes for their cute boy toy, who in 5 years will be stuffed into the "where are they now" file.
*sigh* I just have to stop watching Reality TV, and stop exposing Babycup to the crap that 14 year old girls dish out. Give me my good old gritty dramas. Who says the President of the United States can't be involved in distributing Weapons of Mass Destruction and Bioterrorism to terrorists for them to put to use on US soil? Why can't there be a Jack Bauer who will stop his madness once and for all? That's more real to me than having Pretty Boy Toy as the next plastic MuchMusic VJ ... 3/11/2006 FloorshowWhen you're preparing to have a kid, a lot of things go through your mind. Am I going to be a good mom? What is it that I can teach this kid to make sure they don't become the latest gangsta wannabe, packing a gat? The only thing you can really teach your kid is that which you know. Now, I don't know very much, but I do know what I like. And I like music. So I've been teaching Babycup about music. Babycup and I have been to a few concerts since Babycup implanted into the walls of my womb. We've seen Nine Inch Nails, Dead Can Dance, Doves, Bauhaus, plus we've been listening to everything from the gyrating sounds of Madonna's latest to the sophisticated sounds of Theolonious Monk. And yes, we did listen to Mozart, inadvertently, because I was watching a rebroadcast of Amadeus.
But the music I know best is the music of my youth. My gothic youth (and this is a surprise to you because...). And so, in my quest to relive my youth before I officially become a responsible adult, I decided to see one of my favourite bands of all time, the Sisters of Mercy. There are many reasons, other than the obvious gothic ones, why I love the Sisters. First of all, not only is the music dark, but the sense of humour behind Eldritch's lyrics is equally dark. Secondly, his birthday is the same as mine (different year, obviously), so that makes him a wonderful Taurus. And thirdly, he chastizes his audience and his fans in such a ridiculous manner that you can't help but laugh (or maybe it is that I just get it). Plus, he was so goddamned sexy, long black hair, bone-thin hips and all. Of course he was - he's a Taurus! But I digress...
Now there are people who might frown upon the fact that at 7 months pregnant, I went to a rock concert, in a club, where there was no seating (except at the back). To you I say...well fuck off. There's nothing wrong with going to a concert, especially when there are endorphins and all sorts of pleasure and happy hormones going through my body directly to Babycup. Though I will say that when I first got there, I was wondering what the fuck I was doing there. A band called the Warlocks was opening for the Sisters, and their sound was one 45 minute long navel gaze. There were goths sleeping on the banks at the back of the venue, and it was only 9:30PM. So I sat on the back benches, giving my legs a rest, apologizing to Babycup for making the poor thing listen to such crapshite. And I began to watch all of the goths around my age, still in goth gear (though I must admit that I did wear black velvet myself), strolling by in their long, black leather coats. And I must say that time has not been good to goths. They don't age very well. Either that, or because they used to wear so much makeup and now they're just naturally pale that all of the wrinkles that they were trying to hide 20 years ago are being revealed. In any case, they all looked like death warmed over, which might be what they wanted in the first place.
So I was worried. After all, the last picture I saw of Eldritch had him with white crewcut hair in a white suit. Would he also look as heinous as the minions of fans strolling through the venue? I stood at the back of the crowd, which is the furthest back I had ever been at a Sisters concert in my life (I was against the front rail in New York City in 1990 and I had 3rd row for the infamous Sisters/Public Enemy tour), and tried to look through the skulls towering over me. Somehow, someone was looking after us last night, and there was a clear path to the centre of the stage. The dry ice started to fill the stage...the lights went down...Doktor Avalanche began to thump out the opening beats...the latest guitarist and bassist came out on stage and began to play the opening chords of "Temple of Love"...a roar came up from the crowd as we recognized the strains...and then, the man himself, Andrew Eldritch, stepped to the centre of the stage, in trademark sunglasses, black leather jacket, skinny hips, and...bald. Yes, bald. Shaved clean. The man with the sexiest hair in rock and roll now has a shaved head. I nearly fell over, but for Babycup. In shock, my mouth instinctively sang the lyrics to "Temple" along with Eldritch, as my eyes nearly came out of their sockets. My gaze followed him across the stage - the same posturing, that baritone voice, the long hauls off the cigarette...yes, that was Eldritch, bald, but still Eldritch. And somehow, he was still damn sexy. At 46 years old, the man is still damn sexy. Ah, the joys of being a Taurus.
So Babycup and I danced. We did the traditional gothic sway, and the traditional gothic hip swivel, and of course some headbanging and hair dancing (it is so nice to have long hair again). And part of the way through the new triple-time version of "Anaconda" I realised something. This was the first time I was dancing with my baby. All night, I had one arm wrapped around my belly, and I made sure that we swayed and twirled (as much as a 7 month pregnant woman can twirl) in time to every song. And this was a spectacle. I call it "The Sisters go Vegas". Dry ice, laser beams, lightshow, and Eldritch running the entire show, with the audience eating out of his hand. One of the best club shows I've seen in my life, and I'm glad Babycup was there.
The one thing I do have to say about the show is this - Eldritch and crew managed to do a 1 1/2 hour set, work in 3 encores, and did not play one of their massive massive hits, other than "Temple of Love". There was no Jim Steinman grand production number. The show was Vegas, but not Celine Dion Vegas. And I for one was damn impressed that a band with the longevity and history of the Sisters did not have to revert to drumming up the hits just to please the crowd - they played the songs they wanted to play, and they played them how they wanted to play them (I nearly didn't recognize "Floorshow" or "Anaconda"). And they left us wanting so much more (and they didn't play that one either). That's how you do a real show (are you listening, Trent Reznor?). And that, Keedz, just makes the whole experience even more sexy.
So I really hope that Babycup enjoyed the evening. It felt like it. I know I did, and I will never forget the first time that I danced with my baby in public.
|
|
|